For home builders, home technology ranging from security, safety, comfort, lighting, and environment systems, to appliances, to infotainment, to linkages to others (humans, things, networks, etc.), the prefer-vs.-pay-for debate includes a subtle though powerful third factor, a triangulatior question. Namely, beyond the question of what people say they'd prefer, and what they'd agree to pay for, it's more and more often going to be a question of what they expect.
Parks Associates research director Brett Sappington was on hand this week at our BUILDER Connections event in Dallas, to address some of the " Trend Vs. Fad" questions and observations about home technology and new home design, engineering, and functionality.
One of Sappington's key points was this. Believe it or not, people are not even especially aware when it comes to "smart home" as an offering. Here's Parks' data on people's "familiarity" with the concept.
From the article "Future-Proofing New Homes" by John McManus.
Smart home products provide us with numerous benefits to make our lives more convenient. However, that convenience can come with a price. It’s no secret that in spite of the benefits of smart home...
What accomplishments are you most proud of in your career? I love working with people long term in an environment where hard work breeds success, customer service stands out, and where I can feel t...
"In my previous column, I mentioned some of the world-class technologies highlighted at Parks Associates’ CONNECTIONS Conference held in Frisco, Texas, in May. One of the presentations that caught my...
CE research data from Parks Associates finds 36% of US broadband households who returned a specified CE or smart home device in the last 12 months cited difficulty in setup, installation, and usage as...
