For home builders, home technology ranging from security, safety, comfort, lighting, and environment systems, to appliances, to infotainment, to linkages to others (humans, things, networks, etc.), the prefer-vs.-pay-for debate includes a subtle though powerful third factor, a triangulatior question. Namely, beyond the question of what people say they'd prefer, and what they'd agree to pay for, it's more and more often going to be a question of what they expect.
Parks Associates research director Brett Sappington was on hand this week at our BUILDER Connections event in Dallas, to address some of the " Trend Vs. Fad" questions and observations about home technology and new home design, engineering, and functionality.
One of Sappington's key points was this. Believe it or not, people are not even especially aware when it comes to "smart home" as an offering. Here's Parks' data on people's "familiarity" with the concept.
From the article "Future-Proofing New Homes" by John McManus.
Do-it-yourself security systems and no-contract, hybrid monitoring solutions enabled by DIY security will expand professional monitoring services, conservatively, to an additional 5% of U.S. household...
Smart home products provide us with numerous benefits to make our lives more convenient. However, that convenience can come with a price. It’s no secret that in spite of the benefits of smart home...
That’s according to a survey released this week by Parks Associates. “Almost half of pirates believe stealing content is acceptable because there are no consequences to the behavior” Jennifer Kent,...
Parks Associates research reveals that most owners report experiencing a false alarm in the past 12 months. Parks Associates research reports that siren, phone call, and in-app alerts are the most...
