There's simply no reason for Apple to jump into the crowded low-margin battlefield of smart TVs when it can sell its hardware at gross margins exceeding 40%. Steve Jobs reportedly once told employees, "TV is a terrible business. They don't turn over and the margins suck."
Perhaps Icahn will argue that Apple's brand appeal could convince people to buy $1,500 4K TVs. But in my opinion, TVs don't belong in the same category as smartphones or tablets. Plunging prices across the market indicate that customers favor big screens with low price tags, and the upgrade cycle for TVs is much longer than the one for smartphones and tablets.
In addition, Apple already has a decent foothold in the connected TV market with Apple TV, which accounted for 17% of all streaming media devices in the U.S. last year, according to Parks Associates. That makes it a decent platform for delivering iTunes, its upcoming streaming TV service, and other digital content to customers.
From the article "Why I'm Glad Apple Inc. Killed Its Smart TV Plans" by Leo Sun.
Easy to use and relatively inexpensive, Google’s Chromecast streaming media device caught on quickly with consumers, but it doesn’t hold much staying power when it comes to consistent usage. Ac...
So, from what it appears, or at least as it’s written, the early adoption of Chromecast by American consumers has now cooled significantly, or at least that’s the word from Parks Associates in a wi...
So what happens now? According to January research from Parks Associates, half of the people who say they are interested in the new HBO service will drop their pay-TV subscriptions altogether,...
Good luck catching up with Fitbit in the wearable fitness tracker category. According to new research from Parks Associates, Fitbit commands nearly 40% of the digital fitness tracker market, fa...
