For home builders, home technology ranging from security, safety, comfort, lighting, and environment systems, to appliances, to infotainment, to linkages to others (humans, things, networks, etc.), the prefer-vs.-pay-for debate includes a subtle though powerful third factor, a triangulatior question. Namely, beyond the question of what people say they'd prefer, and what they'd agree to pay for, it's more and more often going to be a question of what they expect.
Parks Associates research director Brett Sappington was on hand this week at our BUILDER Connections event in Dallas, to address some of the " Trend Vs. Fad" questions and observations about home technology and new home design, engineering, and functionality.
One of Sappington's key points was this. Believe it or not, people are not even especially aware when it comes to "smart home" as an offering. Here's Parks' data on people's "familiarity" with the concept.
From the article "Future-Proofing New Homes" by John McManus.
Calix is hitting an attractive market, according to a study by Xfinity Communities and Parks Associates that was released last month. The research found that there are 3.56 million smart apartment res...
A study done by Parks Associates found that subscribers of fixed wireless internet from mobile network operators were more satisfied with the price of service than fiber or cable subscribers. The stud...
Twenty-four percent of multifamily properties report having a smart building provider or aggregator for at least one of the properties they serve, according to a newly published study by Parks Associa...
About 35% of all streaming media devices used in the US are made by Amazon, putting it No. 2 behind Roku, according to Parks Associates, a market research firm based in Addison, Texas. From the art...
