For home builders, home technology ranging from security, safety, comfort, lighting, and environment systems, to appliances, to infotainment, to linkages to others (humans, things, networks, etc.), the prefer-vs.-pay-for debate includes a subtle though powerful third factor, a triangulatior question. Namely, beyond the question of what people say they'd prefer, and what they'd agree to pay for, it's more and more often going to be a question of what they expect.
Parks Associates research director Brett Sappington was on hand this week at our BUILDER Connections event in Dallas, to address some of the " Trend Vs. Fad" questions and observations about home technology and new home design, engineering, and functionality.
One of Sappington's key points was this. Believe it or not, people are not even especially aware when it comes to "smart home" as an offering. Here's Parks' data on people's "familiarity" with the concept.
From the article "Future-Proofing New Homes" by John McManus.
In a separate article CE Pro wrote discussing current trends in home energy management, a representative of Parks Associates stated that this lack of infrastructure, compounded with the current work f...
Amazon doesn't publicly disclose how many Amazon Prime members it is the U.S., or globally for that matter. But late last year, research company Parks Associates published data suggesting that Prime V...
New research from Parks Associates reveals a surge in smart lighting adoption among US internet households, with 13% using smart light bulbs and 6% employing smart lighting control systems. Parks A...
According to a recent whitepaper by Parks Associates, “72 percent of smart home product owners are concerned with the security of personal data collected by their devices.” From the article, "Are C...
