For home builders, home technology ranging from security, safety, comfort, lighting, and environment systems, to appliances, to infotainment, to linkages to others (humans, things, networks, etc.), the prefer-vs.-pay-for debate includes a subtle though powerful third factor, a triangulatior question. Namely, beyond the question of what people say they'd prefer, and what they'd agree to pay for, it's more and more often going to be a question of what they expect.
Parks Associates research director Brett Sappington was on hand this week at our BUILDER Connections event in Dallas, to address some of the " Trend Vs. Fad" questions and observations about home technology and new home design, engineering, and functionality.
One of Sappington's key points was this. Believe it or not, people are not even especially aware when it comes to "smart home" as an offering. Here's Parks' data on people's "familiarity" with the concept.
From the article "Future-Proofing New Homes" by John McManus.
Parks Associates recently reported that 66% of subscribers that get fixed wireless from T-Mobile or Verizon consider their prices to be fair or good. “This compares to 51% of fiber subscribers and 35%...
That’s especially important based on Parks Associates research that shows half of security system owners say they deal with too many false alarms, and more than 60% of respondents say their systems tr...
Executives now want to replicate some of that success in the United States, though they know it will be a challenge: Roku and Amazon control 80% of the domestic streaming TV market with their budget s...
Parks Associates’ research study, Insurance Opportunities in the Smart Home, finds that one-third of U.S. internet households with homeowner’s/renter’s insurance would switch providers to acquire smar...
